Hội thảo nghiên cứu ứng dụng Mật mã và An toàn thông tin

Articles

An Efficient Solution for Privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes Classification in Fully Distributed Data Model

Từ khóakhai phá dữ liệu và học máy đảm bảo tính riêng tư; tính toán bảo mật nhiều thành viên; phân lớp Naïve Bayes; mã hóa đồng cấu; tính riêng tư của dữ liệu

Tóm tắt

Abstract—Recently, privacy preservation has become one of the most important problems in data mining and machine learning. In this paper, we propose a novel privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes classifier for the fully distributed data scenario where each record is only kept by a unique owner. Our proposed solution is based on a secure multi-party computation protocol, so that it has the capability to securely protect each data owner’s privacy, as well as accurately guarantee the classification model. Furthermore, our experimental results show that the new solution is efficient enough for practical applications.

Lượt tải theo tháng

02309/2202/2303/2305/2306/2307/2309/2311/2312/2303/2404/2409/2405/2507/2509/2512/2501/2602/2603/2604/26

Di chuột vào cột để xem số lượt tải.

Cách trích dẫn

Vu Duy Hien (2022). An Efficient Solution for Privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes Classification in Fully Distributed Data Model. Hội thảo nghiên cứu ứng dụng Mật mã và An toàn thông tin, 1(15), 56-61.

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. 1.Y. Lindell and B. Pinkas, “Secure Multiparty Computation for Privacy-Preserving Data Mining,” J. Priv. Confidentiality, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–98, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.v1i1.566.
  2. 2.M. Kantarcıoˇglu, J. Vaidya, and C. Clifton, “Privacy Preserving Naive Bayes Classifier for Horizontally Partitioned Data,” presented at the IEEE ICDM workshop on privacy preserving data mining, 1-7, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.cis.syr.edu/~wedu/ppdm2003/papers/1.pdf
  3. 3.J. Vaidya, M. Kantarcioglu, and C. Clifton, “Privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes classification,” VLDB J., vol. 17, pp. 879–898, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-006-0041-y.
  4. 4.B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
  5. 5.C. Clifton, M. Kantarcioglu, J. Vaidya, X. Lin, and M. Y. Zhu, “Tools for Privacy Preserving Distributed Data Mining,” ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 28–34, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/772862.772867.
  6. 6.Z. Yang, S. Zhong, and R. N. Wright, “Privacy-Preserving Classiflcation of Customer Data without Loss of Accuracy,” in Proceedings of the 2005 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2005, pp. 92–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972757.9.
  7. 7.X. Yi and Y. Zhang, “Privacy-preserving Naive Bayes classification on distributed data via semi-trusted mixers,” Inf. Syst., vol. 34, pp. 371–380, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2008.11.001.
  8. 8.M. E. Skarkala, M. Maragoudakis, S. Gritzalis, and L. Mitrou, “PPDM-TAN: A Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Classifier,” Computation, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/computation9010006.
  9. 9.P. Paillier, “Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes,” in International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, 1999, pp. 223–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48910-X_16.
  10. 10.C. Gentry, “Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices,” in Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 2009, pp. 169–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1536414.1536440.
  11. 11.P. Li, J. Li, Z. Huang, C.-Z. Gao, W.-B. Chen, and K. Chen, “Privacy-preserving outsourced classification in cloud computing,” Clust. Comput., vol. 21, pp. 277–286, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0849-9.
  12. 12.M. Huai, L. Huang, W. Yang, L. Li, and M. Qi, “Privacy-preserving Naive Bayes classification,” in International conference on knowledge science, engineering and management, 2015, pp. 627–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25159-2_57.
  13. 13.T. Li, J. Li, Z. Liu, P. Li, and C. Jia, “Differentially private Naive Bayes learning over multiple data sources,” Inf. Sci., vol. 444, pp. 89–104, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.056.
  14. 14.P. Li, T. Li, H. Ye, J. Li, X. Chen, and Y. Xiang, “Privacy-preserving machine learning with multiple data providers,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 87, pp. 341–350, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.04.076.
  15. 15.V. Duy Hien, L. The Dung, and H. Tu Bao, “An efficient approach for secure multi-party computation without authenticated channel,” Inf. Sci., vol. 527, pp. 356–368, 2020, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.031.
  16. 16.O. Goldreich, “Basic Applications,” in Foundations of Cryptography, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  17. 17.F. Hao, P. Y. A. Ryan, and P. Zielin´ski, “Anonymous voting by two-round public discussion,” IET Inf. Secur., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 62–67, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2008.0127.
  18. 18.H. Hofmann, “Statlog (German Credit Data) Data Set,” 1994. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/statlog+(german+credit+data)

Bài viết liên quan

An Efficient Solution for Privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes Classification in Fully Distributed Data Model | Hội thảo nghiên cứu ứng dụng Mật mã và An toàn thông tin